Logo
Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity Has a People Skills Gap Too

Knowing what happened is valuable. Explaining it clearly enough for someone else to make the right decision is another capability entirely.

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 25, 2026
Cybersecurity Has a People Skills Gap Too

An analyst has spent two hours investigating suspicious activity. They understand the sequence, know which systems may be affected and have a reasonable hypothesis about what the attacker did.

Then the incident manager asks a simple question: “What do we need to do now?”

The answer suddenly requires more than technical knowledge.

Cybersecurity work is full of moments like this. Findings need to be explained. Assumptions need to be challenged. Teams need to disagree without losing time. Technical specialists have to communicate with executives, engineers, auditors and people who would prefer never to hear the phrase “lateral movement” before their first coffee.

NIST’s NICE program treats these capabilities as part of cybersecurity work itself. Its workplace skills resources include communication, collaboration, critical thinking, conflict management, resilience, strategic thinking and relationship building.

That matters for how organizations train cybersecurity professionals.

Communication Changes the Value of Technical Skill

Consider a penetration tester who discovers a serious vulnerability.

Finding it requires technical skill. Explaining why it matters requires another set of abilities.

The tester needs to describe the attack path accurately, separate evidence from assumptions and give developers enough detail to reproduce the problem. Someone may also need to explain the business impact to management without turning the discussion into either a catastrophe or a lecture on protocol internals.

NICE describes cybersecurity communication broadly, from working with teammates and writing reports to creating presentations and engaging leadership and external stakeholders. It also emphasizes listening, because communication fails rather efficiently when everyone is only waiting for their turn to speak.

Pressure Makes Workplace Skills Visible

These capabilities become even easier to see during incidents.

A responder may have incomplete evidence and several teams asking for answers simultaneously. An engineer may disagree with a containment decision because it could disrupt production. Management may want certainty that simply doesn’t exist yet.

Technical knowledge still matters. So does the ability to:

  • Explain what is known, unknown and assumed
  • Ask precise questions under time pressure
  • Challenge a decision without derailing the response
  • Adapt technical detail to different audiences
  • Document decisions so another person can continue the work
  • Recognize when a disagreement needs escalation

NICE specifically includes conflict management because cybersecurity professionals regularly work in situations where the consequences of a poor decision can be substantial.

These Skills Can Be Practised

Communication shouldn’t be left to personality.

A cyber range exercise can require analysts to brief an incident manager after investigating an attack. Penetration testing learners can present findings to a simulated development team. A cloud security exercise can require participants to defend a remediation decision when another team raises operational concerns.

The technical problem remains central. The exercise simply continues until participants have transferred their understanding to someone else.

That approach fits practical development at ITSEC Cyber & AI Academy. Realistic scenarios can train technical capability while also requiring participants to explain findings, coordinate decisions and work through uncertainty.

Cybersecurity teams need people who can find difficult problems.

They also need people who can make those problems understandable to everyone responsible for fixing them.

Explore practical cybersecurity and AI training at ITSEC Cyber & AI Academy.

References: NIST NICE: Workplace Skills and the NICE Framework · NIST: Cyber Career Realities Revealed, announced September 2026 · NIST NICE Workforce Framework

Share this post

You may also like

Calculating the Cost of Securing Your Business
Cybersecurity

Calculating the Cost of Securing Your Business

Tips

As the strategic importance of information security continues to grow for organizations of all sizes, and the complexity of information security increases across industries, business decisions are increasingly driven by the need to protect their intellectual assets and safeguard their IT infrastructure from evolving cybersecurity threats. Securing customer records, protecting sensitive financial information, and complying with regulatory requirements can create significant pressures on IT decision-makers and their resources. While many organizations have traditionally outsourced critical elements of their IT operations to managed service providers, more and more businesses are proactively outsourcing their security functions to specialized information security service providers. This has led to a need for evaluating the benefits of outsourcing security elements and comparing them to managing these processes internally. I wrote this article to help business leaders understand the best way to approach Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) in the context of Total Cost Ownership (TCO), a subject that is frequently discussed and of interest to both technical and non-technical leaders. INTERNAL SOLUTIONS OR OUTSOURCING? The key to evaluating

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Jul 10, 2023 — 8 minutes read
Vulnerability Assessment vs Penetration Testing: What's the Difference and Why Does It Matter?
Cybersecurity

Vulnerability Assessment vs Penetration Testing: What's the Difference and Why Does It Matter?

When discussing cybersecurity assessments, two terms are often used interchangeably: Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing. While both approaches aim to improve an organization's security posture, they serve different purposes and provide different types of insights. Understanding the distinction between the two is important for organizations looking to prioritize risks, strengthen defenses and make better security decisions. Rather than asking which one is better, the more relevant question is: When should you use each approach, and how can they work together? WHAT IS A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT? A Vulnerability Assessment is the process of identifying and evaluating security weaknesses across systems, networks, applications and other digital assets. The primary objective is to discover vulnerabilities before attackers do. WHAT HAPPENS DURING A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT? A typical Vulnerability Assessment may include: * Asset discovery. * Automated vulnerability scanning. * Risk classification and prioritization. * Identification of outdated software and misconfigurations. * Reporting and remediation recommendations. The result is a broad view of potential weaknesses that require attention. STRENGTHS OF VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS Organizations often conduct Vulnerability Assessments

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Jun 15, 2026 — 4 minutes read
This is How Information Security Analysis Protects What Prevention Can't
Cybersecurity

This is How Information Security Analysis Protects What Prevention Can't

INTRODUCTION Organizations worldwide are investing more in cybersecurity than at any point in history, yet breaches are growing more frequent, more expensive, and more damaging. The global average cost of a data breach reached USD 4.88 million in 2024, the highest figure ever recorded. Even more alarming, the average time to identify a breach stood at 194 days, nearly half a year of undetected attacker activity inside a network before anyone realized something was wrong. These numbers raise an urgent question every business leader must answer honestly: if an attacker entered your network today, how long would it take your organization to find out? And once discovered, could you identify exactly what was accessed, how the attacker moved, and what vulnerabilities made it possible in the first place? For most organizations, the honest answer is: not fast enough, and not with enough certainty. That gap is precisely what Information Security Analysis (ISA) is designed to close. Prevention, including firewalls, antivirus, and multi-factor authentication, is necessary but not sufficient. When attackers

|
Mei 11, 2026 — 7 minutes read

Receive weekly
updates on new posts

Subscribe