Logo
Cybersecurity

AI Is Raising the Bar for Cybersecurity Talent

AI can process alerts faster than people ever could. The harder part is knowing when its answer is wrong.

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 02, 2026
AI Is Raising the Bar for Cybersecurity Talent

For cybersecurity teams, AI is quickly moving from something experimental to something people actually use.

The World Economic Forum’s Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026 found that 77% of surveyed organizations had adopted AI for cybersecurity. It is already being used for tasks such as phishing detection, intrusion response and user-behaviour analysis.

That sounds like good news for teams struggling with workload. And mostly, it is.

But AI doesn’t remove the need for skilled cybersecurity professionals. It changes what those professionals need to be good at.

Automation Can Do More. So Humans Have to Do More Too.

The same WEF research found that 54% of organizations considered insufficient knowledge or skills a barrier to using AI effectively in cybersecurity. Another 41% pointed to the need for human oversight.

That second number matters.

AI can analyse enormous amounts of information quickly. What it still struggles with is context: whether an unusual event is genuinely dangerous, how a technical issue affects the business and what action makes sense when the available information is incomplete.

Cybersecurity professionals increasingly need to:

  • Validate AI-generated findings rather than accept them automatically
  • Recognise when an automated recommendation doesn’t fit the situation
  • Investigate activity across cloud, endpoint, identity and network environments
  • Connect technical findings with actual business risk
  • Make decisions when there isn’t a neat textbook answer

In other words, knowing how to use AI is becoming useful. Knowing when not to trust it may be even more useful.

Indonesia Is Facing the Same Shift

Komdigi has been making a similar point.

In August 2026, Vice Minister of Communication and Digital Affairs Nezar Patria said AI was changing both cyber defence and cybercrime. He warned that agentic AI could allow attacks to operate more autonomously while AI-assisted social engineering and deepfakes were becoming harder to recognise.

His response was not simply “use more technology.”

Komdigi has called for stronger AI-based cybersecurity talent, closer collaboration between universities and industry and a move toward security by design, where security becomes part of how systems are built rather than something added after problems appear.

That requires people who understand both the tools and the consequences of using them.

Training Has to Catch Up With the Job

The World Economic Forum ranks networks and cybersecurity among the three fastest-growing skills expected through 2030. It also argues that as AI takes over more repetitive security tasks, professionals will spend more time on oversight, governance and higher-level decision-making.

That changes what good cybersecurity training should look like.

Learning concepts still matters. Certifications still have a role. But professionals also need opportunities to investigate, test assumptions and make decisions in conditions that resemble actual operations.

That is the direction behind ITSEC Cyber & AI Academy, which combines cybersecurity learning with hands-on exercises and scenarios informed by ITSEC Asia’s operational experience.

The goal isn’t to train people to compete with AI at processing information faster.

Machines already have a fairly comfortable lead there.

The goal is to develop professionals who know what the information means and what to do next.

Explore practical cybersecurity and AI training at ITSEC Cyber & AI Academy.

Share this post

You may also like

What Makes AI-Powered Penetration Testing Different From Automated Scanners?
Cybersecurity

What Makes AI-Powered Penetration Testing Different From Automated Scanners?

INTRODUCTION How much of what a vulnerability scanner flags every week actually turns out to be real? Research from OWASP puts the false positive rate for common vulnerability types somewhere between 15% and 30%, and separate research from Snyk found that security teams now spend roughly 70% of their time chasing alerts that end up being nothing at all. That gap between what a tool reports and what is actually exploitable is not a minor inconvenience. It is the reason a third of companies surveyed admitted they responded late to a genuine attack because their team was buried in phantom threats instead. ITSEC Asia, Indonesia's leading cybersecurity company, works with organizations across the region that have learned this the hard way, and the question that keeps coming up is simple. If a scanner already checks the boxes, why does AI-powered penetration testing exist at all, and what does it actually do differently? Source: OWASP false positive research via DEV Community [https://dev.to/kuboidsecurelayer/why-automated-vulnerability-scanners-miss-most-real-security-vulnerabilities-2p96] · Snyk: Minimizing False Positives [https://snyk.io/blog/minimizing-false-positives-enhancing-security-efficiency/] THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE: FOLLOWING RULES

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Jul 03, 2026 — 5 minutes read
Web Application Penetration Testing Explained: Why Applications Remain a Top Target for Attackers
Cybersecurity

Web Application Penetration Testing Explained: Why Applications Remain a Top Target for Attackers

Web applications have become the foundation of digital business. From customer portals and online banking platforms to e-commerce systems and internal business applications, organizations rely on web technologies to deliver services and create seamless user experiences. Unfortunately, attackers rely on them too. Because web applications are often exposed to the internet and handle sensitive information, they remain one of the most attractive targets for cybercriminals. This is why Web Application Penetration Testing has become an essential part of a modern cybersecurity strategy. WHAT IS WEB APPLICATION PENETRATION TESTING? Web Application Penetration Testing is a security assessment designed to identify and validate vulnerabilities within web applications before malicious actors can exploit them. Unlike automated vulnerability scanning, penetration testing simulates real-world attack techniques to understand how weaknesses could affect an organization's confidentiality, integrity and availability. The objective is not simply to discover vulnerabilities but to determine their actual impact. WHY ARE WEB APPLICATIONS FREQUENTLY TARGETED? Attackers are constantly searching for exposed applications because they often provide direct access to valuable assets. SENSITIVE DATA Web applications commonly process: * Customer

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Jun 15, 2026 — 5 minutes read
Your Cybersecurity Skills Gap Might Be a Job Design Problem
Cybersecurity

Your Cybersecurity Skills Gap Might Be a Job Design Problem

Cybersecurity job descriptions can become ambitious documents. An organization needs someone who understands cloud security, investigates incidents, tests applications, manages risk, explains regulations, tunes security tools and perhaps briefs senior management when something goes wrong. Five years of experience preferred. The candidate sounds excellent. Finding this person may take a while. ENISA’s European Cybersecurity Skills Framework offers a useful reminder that cybersecurity isn’t one profession wearing several different badges. The framework separates the field into 12 professional profiles, including Cyber Incident Responder, Cybersecurity Architect, Penetration Tester, Cybersecurity Risk Manager, Digital Forensics Investigator and Cyber Threat Intelligence Specialist. Each profile has different tasks, knowledge and competencies. They also depend on one another. That changes how organizations should think about a “skills shortage.” CHECK THE JOB BEFORE BLAMING THE TALENT POOL Some roles will naturally overlap, particularly in smaller teams. ENISA’s own user manual treats the framework as flexible and shows how organizations can combine responsibilities according to their circumstances. The problem starts when overlap becomes accumulation. A useful workforce review can ask: * Which tasks genuinely

ITSEC AsiaITSEC Asia
|
Sep 22, 2026 — 3 minutes read

Receive weekly
updates on new posts

Subscribe